Sunday, June 2, 2019

Woman in the Nineteenth Century, by Margaret Fuller Essay -- Woman in

Woman in the Nineteenth Century, by Margaret chockablock(predicate)In her essay, Woman in the Nineteenth Century, Margaret Fuller discusses the state of marriage in America during the 1800s. She is a victim of her own knowledge, and is literally considered ugly because of her wisdom. She feels that if certain stereotypes can be down(p) down, wo work force can take on the respect of hands intellectually, physically, and emotionally. She explains why some of the inequalities exist in marriages around her. Fuller feels that once women are accepted as equals, men and women will be able achieve a true love not yet known to the populate of the world.Fuller personifies what is wrong with the thoughts of people in nineteenth century society. She is a well-educated, attractive woman and yet, in America she is considered unmarriageable because of the unintended intimidation her knowledge brings forth. She cant understand why men would not want to find a woman with whom they can carry on a n intelligent, meaningful conversation and still be physically attracted to. She knows that once this lower status complex is gotten past, women will start to excel in all different fields. My interpretation is that Fuller feels if women are educated and skilled then they will be able to take care of themselves until the right man comes along. Their discretion will be tenfold, and they will be able to wait for the proverbial Mr. Right. Fuller gives three wonderful examples of how equality gets broken down in a marriage. The first is the household partnership(42), where the man goes off to work and makes a active to support the family, and the woman stays home barefoot and pregnant, takes care of the children and tends to the house. There is a mutual admiration between the husband and wife because they both go forward up their end of the bargain. But there is no love built into this relationship. Couples like this are merely supplementing each others existence, he by working to s upport her, and her by cooking and cleaning for him. When she states this relation is good, as far as it goes(42), Fuller implies that women are settling for the sake of settling. In the nineteenth century there was a stigma attached to any woman in her twenties who was not yet married. Fuller questions why two people would settle for each other when there are so many people with different things to offer each other. I thi... ...rriage should be based on? Where is the love that they share for each other? Why cant women have it both ways? Why cant they find a man who they love and who will love and respect them back? It is questions such as these that light the fire inside Margaret Fuller. Fuller is not attacking men in this essay it is directed at women as well. She is simply asking that everyone try to look at things differently. She wants people to understand that if women get more pedagogics and skills, men will benefit as well. Fullers passion and desire for equality is most c learly evidenced when she states, What deep communion, what real sexual relation is implied by the sharing the joys and cares of parentage, when any degree of equality is admitted between the parties (42). Fullers point is that if all responsibilities are shared, men and women will get to have a deeper love and respect for one another. They will finally be able to find their true soul mates. They will be marrying each other for who they truly are, not because of convenience, looks, or for good conversation and friendship. They will be marrying a person they truly know, love and respect, and who loves and respects them back.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.